SICs are favorite and frequent tool of animal activist. But
they don’t work. They can work in human rights because human animals are not
considered property unlike other animals. Yes, use of other animals is pervasive
and it will probably take a very long time to end. Some argue because of that
we need to in the mine time use them, to help other sentient beings. Do they help?
Banning production of fur in one country doesn’t save those sentient beings
used for fur if the demand for that animal product is there. They will be transferred
to a country where production of fur is allowed. Same thing applies with banning
of sale of fur in any city. You, know there are other cities.
We come to one the main problem which I have with SICs is
that they send confusing and inconsistent messages that some use is worse than
other. General public can be confused by messages like Fur is murder, Meat is
murder as those are the only animal products which require suffering and death
of other animals.
One reason behind SICs is that general public cannot take or
understand the big picture that all use of other animals is wrong and we need
to go after one use at the time. That’s an elitist stand. How could you understood
and became a vegan. Are you assuming that you are smarter or better in some way
than other people? But the abolitionists are the ones who are called elitist.
That doesn’t make sense. I am not accusing animal activist who use SICs of
being elitist, I am just trying to understand how we are called elitist when we
advocate veganism, unequivocally and claim that people can understand the vegan
message, but you are not called that.
Some SICs ask people who just sign petition and support that
campaign. Those people don’t kill seals, whales, dolphins, etc. so they won’t be
affected if killing those other animal is stopped. Because of that they can
support those campaigns. And they can go home and eat/wear animal products thinking
that they done something for the other animals, but in fact they done nothing.
Let’s take for example ban on slaughtering of horses in US.
That didn’t stopped killing of those sentient beings, they were just taken in
Mexico and killed there. And they endured more suffering because they had to be
transported to those countries. I am in no way supporting killing of horses or
any sentient beings like some so called animal rights organization. That
campaign actually had done nothing good for the horses. But I cannot understand
why people again are campaigning for that ban.
One of the longest running SICs is a campaign against vivisection.
Surprise, surprise it’s not working. In England use of other animals is up http://bit.ly/nOzUpF
Vivisection is a voodoo science. It’s unreliable and
dangerous to us and it brings unimaginable suffering to other animals. If we relied
upon animal testing we would have killed millions of people. We wouldn’t have drugs
like penicillin, digitalis, cortisone, morphine, aspirin, chloroform, insulin
etc. Up to 90% of animal test results are discarded as they are inapplicable to
humans. How can some people discard scientific facts to prolong inflicting suffering
and killing of other animals in pointless experiments?
And do we have evidence that weflarism and SICs decrease use
of other animals. No, we don’t. But we have evidence that use of other animals
is increasing http://bit.ly/vqZdPM it seems
that SICs aren’t working.
Will you continue to use SICs or promote veganism, unequivocally?
Choice is yours.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.