Saturday, December 17, 2011
Peaceful Abolitionist: You don't need money to make a difference
Peaceful Abolitionist: You don't need money to make a difference: It's that time of year again when those big animal welfare organisations are asking people to volunteer their time to go out and raise money...
Saturday, December 10, 2011
LGBT rights = Human rights
I thought for a while to
write a post about human rights and finally I got the inspiration so I will
publish this on Human Rights day, because it’s appropriate. LGBT rights are
part of fundamental human rights. This post is going to about LGBT rights and how
it’s idiotic and hateful to oppose it.
I
cannot understand how you can discriminate against anyone. And discriminations
are form of violence. They should be actively opposed. People hide against
their religion and claim that their god hates and discriminates, they just
follow orders. Due to the fact that there is no evidence of the existence of
your god, when you say god hates something, which means that you hate that.
"You
can tell you've created god in your own image when it turns out that god hates all
the same people you do". ~ Anne Lamatt
If
your beliefs discriminate or deny rights to any sentient beings, your belief
mustn’t be respected and must be opposed. You cannot find common ground with
people who hate or have no desire to change.
It’s
idiotic to oppose something which doesn’t concern or affect you in any way. You
won’t lose any right if they get rights. So why oppose it. And it’s hateful to deny same
rights which you have to other humans.
Some
argue if same-sex marriage is legalized, pedophilia will follow. You thinking process don’t make any
sense. You are comparing same-sex marriage with one of the most hideous things
known to mankind. Think again, this time, use your brain.
Do
opponents of same-sex marriage under traditional marriage consider a marriage
of two unequal parties, when one is owner of other, when she is just a breeding
material whose place is in kitchen, or the newest traditional marriage of two
equal parties? Marriage is a contract, union of two people in love. That covers
same-sex couples. Or do you argue that they cannot be in love.
I am very passionate about human rights. We are all
animals. And I hold these truths to be self-evident, that all animals are
endowed with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and
pursuit of Happiness. On which side of history you want to be, on the right
side fighting for equality, or on the side of hatred, immorality.
Sunday, December 4, 2011
Inability of single issue campaigns to work
SICs are favorite and frequent tool of animal activist. But
they don’t work. They can work in human rights because human animals are not
considered property unlike other animals. Yes, use of other animals is pervasive
and it will probably take a very long time to end. Some argue because of that
we need to in the mine time use them, to help other sentient beings. Do they help?
Banning production of fur in one country doesn’t save those sentient beings
used for fur if the demand for that animal product is there. They will be transferred
to a country where production of fur is allowed. Same thing applies with banning
of sale of fur in any city. You, know there are other cities.
We come to one the main problem which I have with SICs is
that they send confusing and inconsistent messages that some use is worse than
other. General public can be confused by messages like Fur is murder, Meat is
murder as those are the only animal products which require suffering and death
of other animals.
One reason behind SICs is that general public cannot take or
understand the big picture that all use of other animals is wrong and we need
to go after one use at the time. That’s an elitist stand. How could you understood
and became a vegan. Are you assuming that you are smarter or better in some way
than other people? But the abolitionists are the ones who are called elitist.
That doesn’t make sense. I am not accusing animal activist who use SICs of
being elitist, I am just trying to understand how we are called elitist when we
advocate veganism, unequivocally and claim that people can understand the vegan
message, but you are not called that.
Some SICs ask people who just sign petition and support that
campaign. Those people don’t kill seals, whales, dolphins, etc. so they won’t be
affected if killing those other animal is stopped. Because of that they can
support those campaigns. And they can go home and eat/wear animal products thinking
that they done something for the other animals, but in fact they done nothing.
Let’s take for example ban on slaughtering of horses in US.
That didn’t stopped killing of those sentient beings, they were just taken in
Mexico and killed there. And they endured more suffering because they had to be
transported to those countries. I am in no way supporting killing of horses or
any sentient beings like some so called animal rights organization. That
campaign actually had done nothing good for the horses. But I cannot understand
why people again are campaigning for that ban.
One of the longest running SICs is a campaign against vivisection.
Surprise, surprise it’s not working. In England use of other animals is up http://bit.ly/nOzUpF
Vivisection is a voodoo science. It’s unreliable and
dangerous to us and it brings unimaginable suffering to other animals. If we relied
upon animal testing we would have killed millions of people. We wouldn’t have drugs
like penicillin, digitalis, cortisone, morphine, aspirin, chloroform, insulin
etc. Up to 90% of animal test results are discarded as they are inapplicable to
humans. How can some people discard scientific facts to prolong inflicting suffering
and killing of other animals in pointless experiments?
And do we have evidence that weflarism and SICs decrease use
of other animals. No, we don’t. But we have evidence that use of other animals
is increasing http://bit.ly/vqZdPM it seems
that SICs aren’t working.
Will you continue to use SICs or promote veganism, unequivocally?
Choice is yours.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)